I'm confused, a not uncommon occurance in someone of vaguely autistic tendencies, I readily admit.

But take a look at this.

So, here we have the Guardian, upholders of honour and distributors of pious homilies on a daily basis, going like a rat up a drain for the source of the Gilligan story.

Why?

This is the paper that has given many a lecture on the sanctity of journalistic sources. Shurely shum mishtake?